TENTMAKER MUSIC
  • Home
    • Donate
    • About Us
    • Contact
  • CONNECT
  • Music and Media
    • Podcasts
    • Music Submission
    • Music Releases
  • One Voice Ministries
  • EN GEDI MUSIC FEST 2021

Wishes Made True: How To Be A Persuasive Evangelist

8/4/2019

Comments

 
Picture
by Abraham Matthew
John Warwick Montgomery tells the story of a man who was convinced that he was dead.

His wife took him to the local psychiatrist, who decided to change the man’s mind by convincing him of one fact: Dead men don’t bleed.
​

After a week of reading medical texts and viewing autopsies, the man was overwhelmed by the evidence and confessed, “Fine! I’m convinced that dead men don’t bleed!”

The psychiatrist promptly jabbed a needle into the man’s arm. Blood spurted out.

“Great Scott!” the man exclaimed, “Dead men do bleed after all!”

Christians often find themselves in a similar conundrum when sharing the gospel with non-Christians. What they frequently discover is that their counterparts remain unconvinced even when presented with logically watertight arguments for the truth of Christianity. This occurs because their presentation is devoid of persuasion. While the evidence matters immensely, a persuasive method of presentation is also necessary; for our audience must be persuaded of the need to give it a fair hearing and be open to changing their minds.

In his Pensées, Blaise Pascal presents one such method. He writes,
“Men despise religion…The cure for this is first to show that religion is not contrary to reason, but worthy of reverence and respect. Next, make it attractive, make good men wish it were true, and then show that it is.”

I consider the three-step method delineated in this pensée to be a valuable method for evangelistic apologetics since it highlights the need to persuade both the head and the heart during our presentation. Let us examine each of these steps in the context of presenting the Christian message.

THE RATIONAL STEP
Most atheists dismiss religious faith as irrational, or in Dawkinsian terms, a delusion latched onto despite the complete absence of evidence. These preconceptions are the largest stumbling blocks preventing people from considering Christianity.
The rational step is aimed at removing these stumbling blocks to belief. This is the function of a large part of Christian apologetics today, including things like arguments for the existence of God and responses to the problem of evil; while they often don’t convince people to turn to Christianity, they do help them overcome the obstacles erected in their path, demonstrating that the Biblical God is not a “capriciously malevolent bully” and that Christianity itself is “not contrary to reason”.

Unfortunately, many fail to realize that presenting these rational arguments is but the preliminary step in evangelistic apologetics and fail to move beyond this step. Observing that most remain unconvinced of Christianity after hearing them, they wrongly assume that these arguments have no utility.

Conversely, Pascal urges us to continue on from the rational step to the emotional step; to move from the issues of the intellect to those of the heart.

THE EMOTIONAL STEP
Pascal once noted that people are more likely to be convinced by reasons they’ve discovered themselves than by those presented to them. An aim of the emotional step, then, is to help your counterpart generate reasons for belief on their own instead of presenting them with ready-made ones. Another aim of the emotional step is to personalize our presentation. The rational step presents impersonal arguments that respond to objections, while the emotional step takes a more personal approach, attempting to answer the person (Col 4:6), and not just his objections. But how might one go about this?
Perhaps you’re engaging with a naturalist friend who is also a humanist, or someone who holds that there is no reality beyond nature and its laws, but also holds that humans have intrinsic value/dignity and human flourishing ought to be pursued. You can begin by demonstrating how such humanism is naturalistically unsustainable. According to naturalist Richard Dawkins, “There is at bottom no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pointless indifference…. We are machines for propagating DNA.” The logical consequences of naturalism include a world without objective morality, for without a transcendent source, moral facts become the subjective preferences of the majority; a world without objective meaning or purpose, since there’s no explanation for why my life’s purpose is better than Hitler’s; and a world without love, for what is love but a reaction produced by a certain set of hormones when you see that mewling bag of chemicals you call your ‘baby’?
Now, you ask your friend whether he wants to live under a nihilistic naturalistic framework or wants to continue in his humanism, for clearly, he cannot have both. In most cases, he will choose humanism, given our shared desire for a world with morality, meaning, purpose, and love. It is now your opportunity to present a plausible alternate hypothesis – the Christian faith, where morality is ensured by Him who is the Good, meaning and purpose are ensured by the One who created us in His image, and love is ensured by Him who is Love and was willing to demonstrate it in the ultimate form. You can now present the Gospel message in all its beauty, culminating in the sacrifice on the cross as a solution to the human condition.
What have you done so far? You have removed the false obstacles that made him dismiss Christianity at the outset. You’ve then personalized the approach by deconstructing his worldview and presenting him with an alternate hypothesis that has far more appealing consequences to him. You have brought out what is attractive about Christianity, making him “wish it were true.”

But it is imperative to note that the truth of a set of propositions is independent of their emotional appeal or ethical consequences. Why couldn’t nihilism be the ugly truth and the real world be one without morality, meaning, purpose, and love?

It is time to proceed to our final step, showing that while Christianity is rational and attractive enough to make us wish it were true, it is actually true for a completely different reason.

Finish reading over at growingdeeperroots.org 
Comments

    Archives

    June 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018

    Categories

    All
    70x7
    Addiction
    Apologetics
    Article
    Articles
    Artist Feature
    Artist Growth
    Average Joe
    Average Joe Music
    B-Coe
    Bible
    Blog
    BRM
    Brotha Dre
    Celebrity
    Chh
    Christ-centered
    Christian Artist
    Christian Living
    Christian Metal
    Christian Music
    Christian Rap
    Christian Rock
    CLUB
    Discipleship
    Dj's
    FL Studio 20
    FPC
    Interview
    Lecrae
    Leyna Ceville
    Metal
    MIDI
    Ministry Related
    MPC
    Music
    Music Industry
    Music News
    Music Releases
    Music Review
    Music Reviews
    New Music
    News
    Old Man Xero
    Playlists
    Politics
    Pop/edm
    Practical Living
    Producer Tips
    Quiz
    Rap Contest
    Rep
    Spotify
    The Legend Of Xero
    Theody
    Theology
    Tino Hitz
    Tutorial

  • Home
    • Donate
    • About Us
    • Contact
  • CONNECT
  • Music and Media
    • Podcasts
    • Music Submission
    • Music Releases
  • One Voice Ministries
  • EN GEDI MUSIC FEST 2021